Here you might notice that all rulers in Aurora HDR 2018 are optimized for HDR processing, only the top part for exposure, contrast, highlights and shadows is the same.
The differences in both side bar are very obvious comparing them side-by-side: But would you like this on all your images? Besides opening and generating an HDR images takes a lot more time than just opening the raw file in Luminar 2018.īoth programs offer a lot of presets to adjust the image according to your taste with just one mouse-click. Maybe you’ll like the image made with Aurora HDR 2018 better, because there a lot of details in the sky areas and the dark foreground of the image is brighter. Take a look on this comaprism: Luminar 2018 Aurora 2018 Opening a raw file in Luminar 2018 the file is loaded but opening the same raw file in Aurora HDR 2018 the app generates an HDR image first. Aurora HDR 2018īut with this app there is a big difference at the beginning.
Meanwhile i use exposure blending more and more which gives you clear highlights and shadows with a lot of details but not the saturated colors like in a HDR image.īecause of the high dynamic range of modern cameras you couldone RAW file only to generate an HDR image, a function supported by Google’s HDR Efex and Aurora HDR 2018 of course.
Sometime i shoot 5 or more exposures but use only 3 images for a first try in my favorite HDR tool. Mostly i used 3 exposures with a exposure distance of 2 EV between each capture. One reason is that the apps are very similar and on the hand having the HDR function as a useful add-on.Ĭapturing HDR usually is done by doing a exposure bracketing sequence with 3 or more image and merge those images to one HDR image. Once you have created an HDR image, the program is split into three main sections – viewing pane, presets pane, and editing pane.Here in the comments and some newsgroups the question come up to use Aurora HDR 2018 as a replacement for Luminar 2018. Despite the vast array of features available, the layout remains simple and easy to understand. The second part of this Aurora HDR review is to look at the layout of the software. Essentially you are getting an HDR merging program that has the editing features of a fully-fledged post-processing program. We feel the best feature is the advanced post-processing tools and AI-enhanced tools. The list of basic features is impressive – more impressive than many of the other HDR programs we have reviewed.
#Aurora hdr 2018 reviews pdf
#Aurora hdr 2018 reviews pro
We didn’t notice any huge problems, but we feel that 16GB of RAM would help load images quicker and apply filters smoothly.īest HDR Software Compared Aurora HDR vs Photomatix Photomatix Pro 6 Review ON1 Photo RAW Review Basic Features These are the minimum requirements – we recommend using 16GB of RAM – we noticed when testing this program that 8GB of RAM was sometimes insufficient.
To use this program effectively, you need a decent spec computer as you can see from the minimum system requirements below: System Requirements Skylum software has a reputation for being process-intense – Aurora HDR follows this trend. To start this Aurora HDR review, let’s look at the basic features and system requirements.